Forty-two statements. About 6–8 minutes. A directional reading of your Formation Integrity, your Structural Integrity, and the gap between them.
Do not turn a low score into shame or a high score into proof that no repair is needed. Ask where Formation is holding, where Structure is holding, where the gap is widest — and who or what is compensating.
How you instinctively carry load, read from your Pillar pattern. This is a preliminary Top Trio; the full DIAL Leader Assessment™ develops it in depth, with the weighting the Lite tier cannot reproduce.
Your reading shows where your load is going. A Team Story compiles individual readings — with consent recorded first and individual scores withheld below a minimum group size — into a shared picture: where weight is concentrating across the team, what the team is signaling, and which repair conversation should come next. It runs on DIAL Community, the free assessment we build for organizations through Global Mission Support.
Learn more: gmscharity.org/dial-community.html · Sample Team Story: gmscharity.org/dial/team-org/?demo=1
DIAL Lite is a structured self-assessment, and we are building the published evidence behind it. You can contribute this reading to the validation study. Your item answers and scores are submitted with a consent record; your email is optional and is used only to link a future retest and to honor deletion requests. We never store your raw IP address (only a salted hash, for abuse prevention), and study reports only ever use de-identified, aggregate data.
A single reading is a snapshot. Retake DIAL Lite in about 30 days — after working one repair move — and compare the two readings instead of relying on impressions.
Releasing a transparent free tier first — and validating the full instrument before certifying anything — is itself part of the method.
Free, self-scoring, about 6–8 minutes. A directional reading of Formation, Structure, and the gap — enough to know where to look first.
The full 98-item professional instrument — sequential-dependency weighting, gate-level scoring, and empirical norms, with published reliability and validity required before any certified use.
Facilitated team comparison and full-system engagements — baselined at discovery and re-measured at 90 days, so results are reported, not asserted.